Skip to main content

Featured Post

Why I Wrote The Sheet Mechanic (And Why Calculations Aren’t Enough)

For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
NEW RELEASE: Stop trying to be a Hero. Start being a Mechanic. Get "The Sheet Mechanic" on Amazon »
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Stress Analysis Explained: Mohr's Circle, Tresca, and Von Mises

The German engineer Otto Mohr (1835-1918) developed a useful pictorial interpretation of the equations for finding principal stresses and maximum shearing stress at a point in a stressed member.

Advertisement

This method, commonly called Mohr's Circle, involves constructing a circle where the coordinates of each point represent the normal and shearing stresses on a specific plane. The angular position of the radius gives the orientation of that plane.

Understanding the Plot

Mohr's Circle Diagram showing Normal and Shear Stress axes
Figure 1: The geometric relationship between Normal Stress (σ) and Shear Stress (τ).
Coordinate Rules:
  • Normal Stresses (σ): Plotted on the horizontal axis. Tensile (+) is right; Compressive (-) is left.
  • Shearing Stresses (τ): Plotted on the vertical axis. Clockwise rotation is above the axis; Counter-clockwise is below.

The results obtained from Mohr's circle are identical to the equations derived from the free-body diagram. Consequently, it provides an extremely useful visual aid for determining stresses on mutually perpendicular planes.

Although it can be drawn to scale for direct measurement, today it is primarily used as a conceptual aid for analysts performing analytical determinations of stress direction and magnitude.

Visualizing Mohr's Circle with Excel

While analytical calculation is standard, visualizing how the circle changes dynamically with load inputs is powerful. The video below demonstrates how a Mohr's Circle calculator can be built and visualized using Microsoft Excel VBA.

Figure 2: Excel VBA implementation for dynamic stress visualization.

Advertisement

Beyond the Basics: From Mohr's Circle to FEA

While Mohr's Circle is excellent for a single point, modern engineering design deals with complex 3D components where stress varies continuously.

1. Failure Theories: Tresca vs. Von Mises

Mohr's Circle allows us to easily calculate the Maximum Shear Stress. This corresponds directly to the Tresca Failure Criterion, which is conservative and often used for ductile materials.

However, most modern Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software (like Ansys, Abaqus, or SolidWorks Simulation) defaults to the Von Mises yield criterion (Distortion Energy Theory).

Criterion Basis Application
Mohr's / Tresca Max Shear Limit Conservative; simple manual calc.
Von Mises Distortion Energy More accurate for ductile metals (Steel, Alum).

2. Essential Tools for Stress Analysts

If you are performing stress analysis professionally, you cannot rely solely on Excel. Here are the industry-standard references you should have on your desk.

Roark's Formulas for Stress & Strain

The "Bible" of stress analysis. Contains thousands of pre-solved formulas for beams, plates, and shells.

Check Price

Advanced CAS Calculators

For the PE exam, the TI-Nspire CX II CAS can solve stress matrices symbolically, saving hours of algebra.

Shop Calculators

3. Next Steps in Design

Once you have determined the stresses are safe, the next step is ensuring the part fits in the assembly. Check out our guide on Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) to master tolerance stacks.

📐 Engineering Design Standards

Master the fundamental components of precision machine design:

Comments

Dane said…
How do i get it to show mohr's circle plotted in the negative x direction? The graph is not shown fully in the diagram.
Ake said…
Hi

You have to "Enable macros" when opening the excel file.

Please note that if you don't follow these steps, you may not be able to run the macro.

1) Tools > Macro > Security
2) Security Level tab > Medium. > OK
3) Close Microsoft Excel
4) Open the file again and you will see the pop-up
5) Select Enable Macros

Note: step 1 -3, you have to do only once, later you can skip them

I hope this helps.

Ake
stviolet said…
hi ake, love your program,
is it possible for you to include a square diagram with normal stress, shear stress and angels?

i get really confused when relating angle and rotation on square TO morh's circle's angles and rotation.

could you contact me if you can be bothered? slxia1@student.monash.edu.au
Unknown said…
Lovely program. few concerns, if anyone is still managing the comments. A mohr's stress circle should only be one circle with both the shear and normal stress axis to the same scale. I'm not quite sure what the second circle is for. The maximum shear stress for the values entered would be approx 129 Mpa. The angle for the maximum shear stress is correct but i'm not sure how this maximum shear stress value is being calculated or i'm mis-interpreting something.

Popular posts from this blog

Ball Detent Torque Limiter – Working Principle & Selection

Figure 1: The ball detent mechanism provides precise overload protection by disengaging instantly when the torque limit is exceeded. The First Line of Defense: Overload Clutches In high-speed automation and heavy industrial machinery, a "jam" is not a matter of if , but when . Whether it is a cardboard box getting stuck in a packaging machine or a tool crashing in a CNC lathe, the resulting torque spike can destroy gearboxes, twist shafts, and burn out expensive servo motors in milliseconds. A torque limiter (or overload clutch) is the mechanical fuse of the drive system. While electronic monitoring (current limiting) is common, it is often too slow to prevent physical damage from the massive kinetic energy stored in the system inertia. A mechanical torque limiter provides a physical disconnect that operates in a fraction of a second. Search for Torque Limiters & Safety Couplings Advertisement Why Choose ...

Polynomial Cams: Analysis & Design Pitfalls (Part 3)

Figure 1: Mathematical coefficients determine the physical shape. Poor math leads to physical defects like the "dip" shown on the right. In [ Polynomial Cam Function (Derivation of Fifth-degree function) - Part 2 ], we derived the equations for the Fifth-Degree (3-4-5) Polynomial . Advertisement Now, we apply this math to the real world of Mechanical Cam Design . The shape of the physical cam is determined by plotting these functions. Unlike a standard Cycloid curve, the polynomial allows us to manipulate the Start Velocity (v 0 ) and End Velocity (v 1 ) of the follower. However, this flexibility requires careful design. If the coefficients are not balanced, the physical cam profile can develop "dips" or negative slopes, causing the mechanical linkage to behave unpredictably. Case 1: Standard Dwell-to-Dwell (Zero Velocity) Figure 2: The standard profile (v 0 =0, v 1 =0). Safe, smooth, and ide...

Chebyshev Linkage Design: Ratios & Straight-Line Motion

Figure 1: The Chebyshev linkage converts rotary input into approximate straight-line output. Introduction to the Chebyshev Linkage The Chebyshev linkage is a four-bar mechanical linkage that converts rotational motion into approximate straight-line motion . It was invented by the 19th-century Russian mathematician Pafnuty Chebyshev , who was deeply involved in the theoretical problems of kinematic mechanisms. His goal was to improve upon existing designs, such as the Watt Straight-line Mechanism , which James Watt had used to revolutionize the steam engine. While Watt's design produces a lemniscate (figure-eight) curve with a straight section, the Chebyshev linkage is often preferred in specific machinery because the straight-line portion of the path is parallel to the line connecting the two fixed ground pivots. Search for Mechanism Design & Robotics Books Advertisement Design Ratios and Geometry The gen...