For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
The Most Expensive Word on a Drawing Is "Standard" The most dangerous words in an engineering specification are not complex formulas. They are adjectives. "Robust." "Standard." "High quality." "Fast." These words feel safe. They feel aligned. They are not. They are undefined variables. Advertisement Vague words create expensive assumptions. Why "Standard" Creates Downstream Cost When a drawing calls for: Standard tolerance Standard surface finish Standard lead time Each stakeholder interprets it differently. A machinist may assume ISO 2768-m. A designer may mean "what we used on the last job." A purchasing team may assume the lowest commercial grade. These interpretations are not equivalent. The result is variation in: Manufacturing time Material selection Inspection criteria ...