For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
The Failure Scenario: You design a heavy lift conveyor. You need a 60:1 reduction, so you specify a standard right-angle worm gearbox. Upon commissioning, the 5kW motor immediately trips the thermal overload relay. When the motor is turned off, machine vibration causes the conveyor to slowly slide backward, potentially dropping the load. The Cause: You have fallen into two classic power transmission traps: ignoring the exponential efficiency drop of high-ratio worm gears, and relying on a worm gear's "self-locking" capability as a dynamic brake. Specifying a gearbox based solely on output torque and reduction ratio is insufficient. The mechanical interface between the gears dictates the thermal limits, back-drivability, and true operational cost of the machine. This guide compares the physics of Worm Gearboxes versus Planetary Gearboxes . Table of Contents 1. The Physics: Sliding Friction vs Rolling Contact 2. Efficiency Curves ...