Skip to main content

Posts

Featured Post

Why I Wrote The Sheet Mechanic (And Why Calculations Aren’t Enough)

For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
NEW RELEASE: Stop trying to be a Hero. Start being a Mechanic. Get "The Sheet Mechanic" on Amazon »
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Recent posts

Worm Gear vs Planetary Gearbox Efficiency (Self-Locking Explained)

The Failure Scenario: You design a heavy lift conveyor. You need a 60:1 reduction, so you specify a standard right-angle worm gearbox. Upon commissioning, the 5kW motor immediately trips the thermal overload relay. When the motor is turned off, machine vibration causes the conveyor to slowly slide backward, potentially dropping the load. The Cause: You have fallen into two classic power transmission traps: ignoring the exponential efficiency drop of high-ratio worm gears, and relying on a worm gear's "self-locking" capability as a dynamic brake. Specifying a gearbox based solely on output torque and reduction ratio is insufficient. The mechanical interface between the gears dictates the thermal limits, back-drivability, and true operational cost of the machine. This guide compares the physics of Worm Gearboxes versus Planetary Gearboxes . Table of Contents 1. The Physics: Sliding Friction vs Rolling Contact 2. Efficiency Curves ...

The Hidden Cost of "Standard" Tolerances

The Most Expensive Word on a Drawing Is "Standard" The most dangerous words in an engineering specification are not complex formulas. They are adjectives. "Robust." "Standard." "High quality." "Fast." These words feel safe. They feel aligned. They are not. They are undefined variables. Advertisement Vague words create expensive assumptions. Why "Standard" Creates Downstream Cost When a drawing calls for: Standard tolerance Standard surface finish Standard lead time Each stakeholder interprets it differently. A machinist may assume ISO 2768-m. A designer may mean "what we used on the last job." A purchasing team may assume the lowest commercial grade. These interpretations are not equivalent. The result is variation in: Manufacturing time Material selection Inspection criteria ...

Ghosting vs Input Shaping: Fixing 3D Printer Ringing

The Failure Scenario: You upgraded to linear rails. You tightened your belts. But when you print a calibration cube at 100mm/s, you see "echoes" (ripples) next to the letter X. This is Ghosting (or Ringing). The Cause: This is a Resonance problem. Every machine has a "Natural Frequency" (fn)—like a guitar string. When your print head changes direction sharply, it "plucks" the frame. If the frequency of that pluck matches the frame's natural frequency, the machine vibrates uncontrollably. The solution is not hardware—it is math. This guide explains how Input Shaping cancels these vibrations before they even start. Table of Contents 1. The Physics: Acceleration vs Jerk 2. The Magic: How Input Shaping Works 3. Tuning Guide: Accelerometer vs Manual 4. Engineering Summary Advertisement 1. The Physics: Acceleration vs Jerk To understand ghosting, you must underst...

Fixing Z-Banding: The Over-Constraint Myth (Top Bearings & Oldhams)

The Failure Scenario: You upgraded to a rigid frame. You added a bearing block to the top of your lead screw to "stabilize" it. But now, your prints look worse . They have regular horizontal ribs (Z-Banding) every 8mm. The Cause: You have created a Statically Indeterminate System . By constraining a bent lead screw at both ends (Motor + Top Bearing), you force the screw to bow outwards like a banana. This wobble gets pushed directly into your nozzle. While our previous guide covered basic couplers , this guide dives into the Kinematics of Alignment and why "Oldham" couplers are the secret weapon against Z-banding. Table of Contents 1. The "Top Bearing" Myth (Over-Constraint) 2. Z-Wobble vs Z-Banding: The Physics 3. The Solution: Oldham Couplers 4. Engineering Summary Advertisement 1. The "Top Bearing" Myth (Over-Constraint) In machine design, proper con...

Stepper Motor Layer Shifts: Fixing Back EMF & Corner Speed

The Failure Scenario: You are printing at 150mm/s. Suddenly, a loud "CLICK-CLICK" noise comes from the X-axis. Your print instantly shifts 5mm to the right. The rest of the print is ruined. Figure 1: A "Layer Shift" on a calibration cube. The motor lost synchronization during a fast travel move, causing the printer to lose its X/Y coordinate home. The Cause: This is a Lost Step (Desynchronization). Your motor hit its "Corner Speed" limit. The magnetic field was spinning faster than the rotor could follow, causing the magnets to slip. While you might think you need a "bigger motor," the real problem is usually Back EMF . This guide explains why torque vanishes at high speed and how to fix it. Table of Contents 1. Engineering Deep Dive: Why Torque Drops 2. The "Corner Speed" Limit 3. Solution A: Higher Voltage (48V) 4. Solution B: Inertia Matching (NEMA 23) 5. Comm...

Timing Belts vs Ball Screws: Fixing Backlash & Ovals

The Failure Scenario: You print a perfect 20mm calibration cube. Then you print a 20mm cylinder... but it measures 19.5mm on the X-axis and 20.5mm on the Y-axis. It’s an oval. The Cause: This is Hysteresis (or "Slop"). Your Timing Belts are stretching like rubber bands every time the motor changes direction. The motor moves, but the carriage waits for the belt to "catch up." Engineering Note: This error compounds during Circular Interpolation (G2/G3 moves) , where both axes must reverse direction continuously to trace an arc. Any backlash here instantly deforms the geometry. This is why CNC mills use Ball Screws (SFU1204) . They replace the rubber band with a rigid steel screw, offering near-zero stretch and high precision. Table of Contents 1. The Physics of Stretch: GT2 vs Steel 2. Engineering Deep Dive: Backlash Mechanics 3. The Speed Trap (Why Printers Don't Use Screws) 4. Selection Matri...

Linear Rails vs Rods (MGN12 vs LM8UU): Fix Ringing & Ghosting

The Failure Scenario: You just finished a 20-hour print. It looks okay from a distance, but when you shine a light on the surface, you see it: Ringing (or "Ghosting"). Faint, rippling waves echoing near sharp corners. The Cause: Your motion system is acting like a guitar string. The heavy print head changes direction, and the Linear Rods flex and vibrate. This vibration gets stamped directly into your plastic. This is why high-end Voron and RatRig printers use Linear Guide Rails (MGN) . They don't just "slide" smoother—they are mathematically designed to eliminate the flex that kills print quality. Table of Contents 1. The Physics of Stiffness: Rods vs Rails 2. Engineering Deep Dive: The "Beam Deflection" Factor 3. The "Over-Constraint" Trap 4. Selection Matrix: When to Upgrade 5. Common Questions (FAQ) Advertisement 1. The Physics of Stiffness: R...