Skip to main content

Featured Post

Why I Wrote The Sheet Mechanic (And Why Calculations Aren’t Enough)

For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
NEW RELEASE: Stop trying to be a Hero. Start being a Mechanic. Get "The Sheet Mechanic" on Amazon »

Perpetual Motion: The Engineering Dream vs. The Laws of Physics


Figure 1: The Quest for Free Energy. Perpetual motion machines inevitably fail because energy lost to friction (Entropy) cannot be recovered in a closed system.

The Quest for Free Energy

Perpetual motion describes "motion that continues indefinitely without any external source of energy." For centuries, engineers, inventors, and charlatans have tried to build machines that produce more energy than they consume.

While the idea is romantic—a machine that runs forever and powers our homes for free—there is a rigorous scientific consensus that perpetual motion in an isolated system is physically impossible.

Advertisement

The Physics: Why They Always Stop

To understand why these machines fail, we don't need complex calculus. We just need to understand two fundamental laws of the universe.

1. First Law (You Can't Win)

Energy cannot be created or destroyed.

Think of energy like a bank account.
Energy Out = Energy In - Cost of Operation

A perpetual motion machine claims to withdraw money from an account that never received a deposit. It is a mathematical impossibility.

2. Second Law (You Can't Break Even)

The killer is Entropy (Friction).

Every mechanical system has friction (air resistance, bearing drag). Friction converts useful motion into useless heat.

Even if a machine is 99.99% efficient, it loses 0.01% of its energy every second. Eventually, the "battery" of kinetic energy drains to zero.

Common Types of "Fake" Perpetual Machines

Despite the laws of physics, YouTube is filled with videos of machines that seem to run forever. Here is the engineering reality behind the two most common types.

Type A: The Overbalanced Wheel (Gravity)

The Concept: Weights on one side of a wheel extend further out (creating more torque) than weights on the other side. The inventor believes the "heavy" side will constantly pull the wheel down.

The Reality: While the weights on the extended side have a longer lever arm, there are fewer weights on that side compared to the retracted side. The torque sums to zero. Gravity is a conservative force—it gives back exactly as much energy as you put in to lift the weight.

Diagram of an Overbalanced Wheel showing torques cancelling out
Figure 2: The "Overbalanced Wheel" fails because the sum of torques on the left always equals the sum on the right.

Type B: The Magnetic Motor

The Concept: Using powerful Neodymium magnets arranged in a circle to push a rotor indefinitely using magnetic repulsion.

The Reality: Magnets are not energy sources; they are like springs. Pushing two magnets together stores potential energy. When they push apart, they release that energy. Once they are apart, you must put energy back in to push them together again. This is called "Cogging Torque" and it stops the motor.

Diagram of Magnetic Motor showing Cogging Torque sticking points
Figure 3: Magnetic motors always find a "sticking point" (equilibrium) where the magnetic fields cancel out.
Advertisement

Video Analysis: Visualizing the Impossible

Warning: The videos below are simulations or motorized tricks. They illustrate how these machines are supposed to work, or they use hidden batteries/air compressors to trick the viewer.

1. Bhaskara’s Wheel (Overbalanced Wheel)

Notice how the arms flip out? In reality, the energy lost by the "clack" sound of the arm hitting the stop is energy leaving the system. This machine would stop rapidly in real life.

2. The Magnetic Motor Hoax

This is a classic internet hoax. Usually, there is a hidden battery in the wooden base driving a small coil, or a stream of compressed air blowing on the fan blades. Static magnets cannot create continuous rotation.

3. The Water Recirculation Trick

Based on M.C. Escher's art. In physics, water cannot flow uphill without a pump. This video likely uses a hidden pump in the base structure.

4. Complex Gravity Machines

The more complex the machine, the easier it is to hide a motor. The complexity distracts the viewer from the simple fact: Friction exists.

Conclusion

While these machines are fascinating mechanical art pieces, they are not energy solutions.

  • Fact: If a machine produces sound, it is losing energy.
  • Fact: If a machine has moving parts, it creates heat (friction), which is losing energy.

The pursuit of efficiency is real engineering; the pursuit of perpetual motion is magic.

References & Further Reading

Comments

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Popular posts from this blog

Dowel Pins & Locating Pins: The Basics of Fixture Design

Figure 1: A typical fixture setup. Notice how dowel pins (silver) provide precise location, while bolts (not shown here) provide the clamping force. In the world of Precision Engineering , the difference between a high-quality product and a scrap part often comes down to microns. While bolts hold parts together, they are terrible at positioning them. This is where Dowel Pins and Locating Pins become essential components in industrial tooling . Advertisement What is a Dowel Pin? Dowel pins are precision-ground fasteners used to secure the relative position of two parts. They are typically machined to extremely tight tolerances (often within 0.0001 inches) and are available in materials like: Hardened Steel: For high-wear applications in CNC fixtures . Stainless Steel: For corrosion resistance in medical or food processing machinery. Plastic (Thermoplastic): For lightweight, non-conductive, low-load alignment. The ...

Engineer's Guide to Ball Detent Torque Limiters

Figure 1: The ball detent mechanism provides precise overload protection by disengaging instantly when the torque limit is exceeded. The First Line of Defense: Overload Clutches In high-speed automation and heavy industrial machinery, a "jam" is not a matter of if , but when . Whether it is a cardboard box getting stuck in a packaging machine or a tool crashing in a CNC lathe, the resulting torque spike can destroy gearboxes, twist shafts, and burn out expensive servo motors in milliseconds. A torque limiter (or overload clutch) is the mechanical fuse of the drive system. While electronic monitoring (current limiting) is common, it is often too slow to prevent physical damage from the massive kinetic energy stored in the system inertia. A mechanical torque limiter provides a physical disconnect that operates in a fraction of a second. Search for Torque Limiters & Safety Couplings Advertisement Why Choose ...

Watt Straight-Line Linkage: Analysis and Automotive Uses

Figure 1: Watt's linkage example geometry and path generation. Introduction to Watt's Linkage The Watt's linkage (also known as the parallel motion linkage) is a cornerstone in the history of mechanical engineering. It is a type of four-bar linkage originally invented by James Watt in the late 18th century to solve a critical problem in steam engine design: constraining the piston rod to move in a straight line without using high-friction guideways. Before this invention, engines used chains to connect the piston to the beam, which meant they could only pull, not push. Watt's rigid linkage allowed for double-acting engines (pushing and pulling), doubling the power output. He was immensely proud of this kinematic solution, describing it in a 1784 letter to his partner Matthew Boulton: "I have got a glimpse of a method of causing a piston rod to move up and down perpendicularly by only fixing it to a piece of iron u...