For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
In post [Part 1 - No Overlap Movement], we established the core design requirement: The die must work synchronously with the indexing mill.
Advertisement
Figure 1: The physical system requires precise synchronization.
The Problem: Rigid Sequencing
Without detailed calculation, inexperienced designers often end up with a rigid timing diagram. The die waits for the indexing to completely finish before moving.
The Consequence:
This compressed movement window results in extremely high acceleration (4.15 m/s²). This leads to massive inertial forces, vibration, and premature equipment failure.
This compressed movement window results in extremely high acceleration (4.15 m/s²). This leads to massive inertial forces, vibration, and premature equipment failure.
The Solution: Optimized Overlap
In post [Part 3 - Cycloid Cam Profile Analysis], we utilized the "Soft Start" properties of the Cycloid profile. By allowing the motions to overlap safely, we extended the indexing angle significantly without causing collisions.
The Engineering Impact:
We calculated that the maximum acceleration for this new timing diagram is 5 times lower than the original. This is the power of smart Motion Simulation.
We calculated that the maximum acceleration for this new timing diagram is 5 times lower than the original. This is the power of smart Motion Simulation.
Advertisement
Visual Verification: "Digital Prototyping" in Excel
Before manufacturing expensive cams or programming PLC Logic, engineers should verify their designs. This is often called "Virtual Commissioning."
While you could use high-end software like Siemens NX or SolidWorks Motion, Microsoft Excel is often powerful enough for 2D kinematics verification.
The Simulation Setup:
- Geometry: Plot the geometric shape of the indexing mill and die using X-Y scatter charts.
- Driver: Create "Driver" cells that represent the Master Clock (Time/Angle).
- Math: Link the position of the shapes to the driver cells using the Cycloid formulas derived in Part 2.
- Animation: Use a simple VBA loop to increment the "Driver" cells, creating real-time movement.
Watch the Comparison Video below:
Notice how the "Overlap" version (Right) moves smoother and slower, while completing the cycle in the exact same total time as the "No Overlap" version (Left).
Conclusion
This example demonstrates that by simply analyzing the timing diagram during the design phase, you can reduce industrial maintenance costs and improve machine reliability without spending a dime on hardware.
While we used standard Cycloid curves here, advanced designers might optimize this further using Polynomial Cam Functions.
Comments