In automation design, the choice between a Stepper Motor and a Servo Motor is often decided by budget. But looking at the price tag alone is a mistake that leads to machine failure. Steppers are excellent for holding loads stationary (high holding torque). Servos are kings of high-speed motion. If you choose a stepper for a high-speed application, it will lose torque and "miss steps." If you choose a servo for a simple low-speed application, you have wasted $500. This guide explains the physics behind the choice. Table of Contents 1. Open Loop vs. Closed Loop (The Risk) 2. The Torque Curve: Speed Kills Steppers 3. Inertia Mismatch 4. Selection Summary Advertisement 1. Open Loop vs. Closed Loop (The Risk) The biggest difference is not the motor itself, but how it is controlled. Figure 1: Steppers run "blind" (Open Loop). Servos use an encoder to verify position (Closed Loop). ...
In post [Part 1 - No Overlap Movement], we established the core design requirement: The die must work synchronously with the indexing mill.
Advertisement
Figure 1: The physical system requires precise synchronization.
The Problem: Rigid Sequencing
Without detailed calculation, inexperienced designers often end up with a rigid timing diagram. The die waits for the indexing to completely finish before moving.
The Consequence:
This compressed movement window results in extremely high acceleration (4.15 m/s²). This leads to massive inertial forces, vibration, and premature equipment failure.
This compressed movement window results in extremely high acceleration (4.15 m/s²). This leads to massive inertial forces, vibration, and premature equipment failure.
The Solution: Optimized Overlap
In post [Part 3 - Cycloid Cam Profile Analysis], we utilized the "Soft Start" properties of the Cycloid profile. By allowing the motions to overlap safely, we extended the indexing angle significantly without causing collisions.
The Engineering Impact:
We calculated that the maximum acceleration for this new timing diagram is 5 times lower than the original. This is the power of smart Motion Simulation.
We calculated that the maximum acceleration for this new timing diagram is 5 times lower than the original. This is the power of smart Motion Simulation.
Advertisement
Visual Verification: "Digital Prototyping" in Excel
Before manufacturing expensive cams or programming PLC Logic, engineers should verify their designs. This is often called "Virtual Commissioning."
While you could use high-end software like Siemens NX or SolidWorks Motion, Microsoft Excel is often powerful enough for 2D kinematics verification.
The Simulation Setup:
- Geometry: Plot the geometric shape of the indexing mill and die using X-Y scatter charts.
- Driver: Create "Driver" cells that represent the Master Clock (Time/Angle).
- Math: Link the position of the shapes to the driver cells using the Cycloid formulas derived in Part 2.
- Animation: Use a simple VBA loop to increment the "Driver" cells, creating real-time movement.
Watch the Comparison Video below:
Notice how the "Overlap" version (Right) moves smoother and slower, while completing the cycle in the exact same total time as the "No Overlap" version (Left).
Conclusion
This example demonstrates that by simply analyzing the timing diagram during the design phase, you can reduce industrial maintenance costs and improve machine reliability without spending a dime on hardware.
While we used standard Cycloid curves here, advanced designers might optimize this further using Polynomial Cam Functions.
Comments