When you search Google for "timing diagram", you typically find results about electrical timing diagram software for digital logic or PLC programming. However, in the context of Mechanical Machine Design, a Timing Diagram is a critical engineering tool that represents the sequential kinematics of mechanism movement.
It is the standard visualization for engineers to ensure synchronization between cam drives, servo motors, and pneumatic actuators in complex automation cells.
By properly designing the timing diagram, we can optimize motion profiles to be smoother even at higher speeds. This directly improves OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) and significantly reduces operational costs.
We typically draw the timing diagram using the Master Cam Angle (degrees) on the horizontal axis and the Mechanism Displacement (mm) on the vertical axis.
The Goal: Reducing Inertial Forces & Maintenance
The primary purpose of a timing diagram is not just to see "when" things move, but to identify opportunities to reduce the acceleration (and thus the inertial force) of moving parts.
Experience shows that many mechanisms are designed without using "overlap" movement. This forces machine parts to travel from point A to point B in a very short time window. This rapid movement causes massive acceleration spikes, leading to:
- Increased torque demand and thermal stress on servo motors and gearboxes.
- Harmonic vibration that loosens fasteners.
- Premature bearing failure, requiring expensive predictive maintenance and unplanned downtime.
If we provide overlap motion between relevant mechanisms, the parts can travel the same distance but over a longer period (larger cam angle). This drastically reduces peak acceleration, lowers the inertial forces, and extends the machine's lifespan.
Real-World Example: Indexing Mill Die Press
Let's analyze a simple automation station: A press mechanism that inserts a die into a hole on an indexing mill (turret).
Operation Parameters:
- Turret: 24 stops, moves 100 mm arc length per index.
- Turret Motion: Uses a Cycloid Cam Profile with an indexing angle of 150°.
- Die Stroke: After the mill stops, the die moves down (Cycloid profile) into the hole.
- Travel Distance: 20mm (approach) + 31mm (depth) - 1mm (gap) = 50 mm.
- Process Requirement: The die must dwell (stay) at the bottom for 100°.
- Return: It moves up before the mill rotates again.
- Total Cycle: 360° (One complete machine cycle).
Scenario 1: No Overlap Calculation (The "Bad" Design)
If we design the timing diagram linearly without any overlap, the sequence is rigid: The die waits until the mill has completely finished indexing before it starts moving. This is a common beginner mistake.
Calculating the Available Time
With no overlap, the die must fit its entire Down-Dwell-Up movement into the remaining time after the mill stops.
Angle = 360° - 150° - 100° = 110°
We must split this remaining 110 degrees equally for the Up and Down strokes.
Resulting Sequence:
- 0° - 150°: Mill Indexes (Die waits).
- 150° - 205°: Die Moves Down (Duration: 55°).
- 205° - 305°: Die Dwells at bottom (Duration: 100°).
- 305° - 360°: Die Moves Up (Duration: 55°).
This calculation is easy, but is it efficient? Compressing a 50mm move into just 55 degrees of rotation creates massive inertial forces.
In the next post [Timing Diagram Part 2: Maximum Acceleration], we will calculate the G-forces generated by this "No Overlap" design. We will then compare it with an optimized "Overlap" design using a simple Microsoft Excel simulation to visualize the dramatic difference in motion smoothness.
Comments