For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
Machine designers frequently deal with complex equations in their design projects. While some roots can be found directly, many algebraic and transcendental equations require numerical approximation.
Advertisement
For example, the classical equation f(x) = e-x - x cannot be solved analytically. In these cases, engineers rely on robust Root Finding Algorithms.
Figure 1: Numerical methods approximate the point where the function crosses zero.
These algorithms generally fall into two categories: Bracketing Methods and Open Methods.
1. Bracketing Methods
Bracketing methods require two initial guesses that must "bracket" the root (one positive, one negative relative to the root). They are reliable but often slower.
- The Bisection Method: An incremental search based on sign changes. It repeatedly cuts the interval in half. Also known as binary chopping or Bolzano's method.
- The False-Position Method: An improvement on bisection. It connects the two points with a straight line (linear interpolation) to estimate the "false position" of the root, often converging faster.
Advertisement
2. Open Methods
My preferred technique in root finding is usually an Open Method. Unlike bracketing, these formulas require only a single starting value.
The Trade-off: Open methods can diverge (fail to find the root) if the initial guess is poor. However, when they do converge, they are significantly faster than bracketing methods.
Figure 2: The Newton-Raphson method uses the slope (derivative) to project the next guess.
- Simple One-Point Iteration: Rearranging the formula to solving for x.
- The Newton-Raphson Method: The industry standard. It uses the slope (first derivative) of the function to project a tangent line to the x-axis. It is favored for its quadratic convergence speed.
- The Secant Method: A variation for when the derivative is difficult to calculate. It approximates the slope using a finite divided difference between two points.
🚀 Next Step: Automate It
In the next post, we will implement the Newton-Raphson Method using Microsoft Excel VBA.
Get the Excel VBA Code for Root Finding »
Comments