Skip to main content

Featured Post

NEMA 17 vs NEMA 23: Torque, Speed, and When to Upgrade

When building a CNC router or upgrading a 3D printer, the first question is usually: "Is NEMA 17 enough, or do I need NEMA 23?" Most beginners look at the Holding Torque and stop there. This is a mistake. A NEMA 23 motor isn't just "stronger"—it is physically different in ways that affect your speed, your driver choice, and your machine's ability to avoid missed steps. If you choose a NEMA 17 for a heavy gantry, it is far more likely to overheat or lose steps under cutting load. If you choose NEMA 23 for a fast 3D printer, it might actually run slower than the smaller motor. This guide explains the engineering limits of each frame size. Table of Contents 1. Physical Difference (The Frame Size) 2. Torque & Speed (The Inductance Trap) 3. Driver Compatibility 4. Selection Summary Advertisement 1. Physical Difference (The Frame Size) "NEMA" is just a standard for ...
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Engineering Guide: Bolt Selection, Clamping Force & Torque Calculation

Engineering diagram showing tensile load in bolt and compressive clamping force in plates
Figure 1: A bolted joint works like a stiff spring. Tightening the nut stretches the bolt (tension) and compresses the parts (clamping force).

1. Bolt Selection for Required Clamping Force

The primary goal of a bolted joint is to provide a required clamping force (F) between mechanical components to prevent separation or sliding.

If a set of n bolts is used, and the total load is distributed equally, the required clamping load per bolt is:

P = F / n
Advertisement

Defining Material Limits (Proof Strength)

Bolts are selected from standard grades (e.g., SAE J429 Grade 5 or 8, ASTM A325). Instead of designing to the yield strength, bolt design uses Proof Strength (σ).

Engineering Insight: Proof vs. Yield
Proof strength is slightly lower than yield strength. It is the maximum tensile stress a bolt can withstand without experiencing any permanent set. Designing to proof strength ensures the bolt remains entirely elastic during assembly.

We design the bolt to operate at a specific percentage, K%, of its proof strength. This parameter K is the demand factor (typically 75% to 90% for preload).

The allowable tensile stress (σa) and minimum required tensile stress area (At) are calculated as:

σa = K × Ïƒ
At = P / σa

Using standard thread tables, select a bolt size with a tensile stress area equal to or greater than the calculated At.

2. The Tightening Torque Requirement

We cannot easily measure clamping force directly on the assembly line. Instead, we measure the tightening torque applied to the nut and correlate it to the desired preload.

Mechanic using a digital torque wrench to apply precise tightening torque to a bolt
Figure 2: Torque is used as a proxy for preload. Accurate torque application is critical for joint integrity.

The short-form equation to estimate required torque is:

T = k1 × D × P
  • T = Required tightening torque (in-lb or N-m)
  • D = Nominal outside diameter of the thread (in or m)
  • P = Desired clamping load per bolt (lb or N)
  • k1 = Torque coefficient (Nut Factor)
Advertisement

3. The Torque Coefficient (k₁) & Lubrication

The torque coefficient, k1, is the most critical and variable part of the equation. It represents friction in the threads and under the nut face. Nearly 90% of applied torque is lost to friction; only about 10% actually stretches the bolt.

Graph showing how lubrication drastically reduces the torque required to achieve clamping force
Figure 3: The condition of the threads drastically changes the required torque. Lubrication lowers friction, requiring less torque for the same preload.

Typical values for k1 generally accepted in industry:

  • k1 ≈ 0.15 (Lubricated): For average commercial conditions where any lubrication is present, including residual cutting fluids or intentional anti-seize application.
  • k1 ≈ 0.20 (Dry): For clean, dry, unlubricated steel threads.
⚠️ Critical Warning: The Danger of Lubrication
If a torque specification is calculated for a "Dry" condition (k=0.20), but the installer lubricates the bolt (k=0.15), applying the specified dry torque will result in significant over-tightening, potentially yielding or breaking the bolt.

4. Advanced Considerations

This guide covers the fundamental mechanics of bolt selection. However, critical joint design requires analyzing several more complex failure modes:

  • Thread Stripping: Ensuring the nut or tapped hole is strong enough to withstand the load without the threads shearing off.
  • Fatigue Failure: Bolts subjected to cyclic loading (vibration) need careful fatigue analysis, not just static strength checks.
  • Preload Relaxation: Over time, gaskets creep and threads settle, causing a loss of clamping force (embedding).

Related article: Overview of Bolts, Nuts, Screws, and Studs

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dowel Pins & Locating Pins: The Basics of Fixture Design

Figure 1: A typical fixture setup. Notice how dowel pins (silver) provide precise location, while bolts (not shown here) provide the clamping force. In the world of Precision Engineering , the difference between a high-quality product and a scrap part often comes down to microns. While bolts hold parts together, they are terrible at positioning them. This is where Dowel Pins and Locating Pins become essential components in industrial tooling . Advertisement What is a Dowel Pin? Dowel pins are precision-ground fasteners used to secure the relative position of two parts. They are typically machined to extremely tight tolerances (often within 0.0001 inches) and are available in materials like: Hardened Steel: For high-wear applications in CNC fixtures . Stainless Steel: For corrosion resistance in medical or food processing machinery. Plastic (Thermoplastic): For lightweight, non-conductive, low-load alignment. The ...

Hoeken's Linkage: Kinematics and Walking Robot Design

Figure 1: Animated simulation of the Hoeken’s Linkage showing the characteristic "tear-drop" coupler curve. 🚀 New Design Guide Available Don't just read about it—build it. Check out our new tutorial: How to Design a Hoeken’s Linkage in Excel (with Free VBA Simulator) » Introduction to the Hoekens Linkage The Hoekens linkage is a specialized four-bar mechanism designed to convert rotational motion into an approximate straight-line motion. While it serves a similar purpose to other straight-line generators, its unique coupler curve—a "tear-drop" shape—makes it exceptionally useful for intermittent motion and walking machines. One of the most fascinating aspects of kinematic theory is the concept of "Cognates." The Hoekens linkage is actually a cognate linkage of the Chebyshev Straight-line Mechanism . This means that while the physical structure and link lengths differ, they can generate...

Watt Straight-Line Linkage: Analysis and Automotive Uses

Figure 1: Watt's linkage example geometry and path generation. Introduction to Watt's Linkage The Watt's linkage (also known as the parallel motion linkage) is a cornerstone in the history of mechanical engineering. It is a type of four-bar linkage originally invented by James Watt in the late 18th century to solve a critical problem in steam engine design: constraining the piston rod to move in a straight line without using high-friction guideways. Before this invention, engines used chains to connect the piston to the beam, which meant they could only pull, not push. Watt's rigid linkage allowed for double-acting engines (pushing and pulling), doubling the power output. He was immensely proud of this kinematic solution, describing it in a 1784 letter to his partner Matthew Boulton: "I have got a glimpse of a method of causing a piston rod to move up and down perpendicularly by only fixing it to a piece of iron u...