For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
The Engineering Challenge: In 2005, I was tasked with upgrading a mechanical transfer turret used to handle highly fragile glass tubes between a conveyor and another process. Production demanded a 25% throughput increase—jumping from 1,200 UPH (Units Per Hour) to 1,500 UPH. Simply speeding up the main drive motor was impossible; the resulting inertial forces and acceleration spikes would have violently shattered the glass tubes before they ever reached the sealing station. The Solution: When you need to increase machine throughput without increasing acceleration forces, the answer is almost always overlapping motion . However, overlapping mechanisms in tight spaces introduces a severe risk of catastrophic mechanical collisions. To validate this 25% speed increase safely, I didn't use expensive 3D motion analysis software. Instead, I used Microsoft Excel and VBA to build a custom 2D kinematic simulator. Here is how that mathematical model was built, and how that exact m...