Every linear motion design starts with the same choice: How do you convert rotary motor motion into linear travel? The two most common answers are the Lead Screw (simple, cheap, friction-based) and the Ball Screw (complex, expensive, rolling-based). Making the wrong choice here is costly. Use a lead screw where you need precision, and you get backlash. Use a ball screw in a vertical lift without a brake, and your load crashes to the floor. In this guide, we compare them side-by-side. Table of Contents 1. The Physics: Sliding vs. Rolling 2. Efficiency & The "Back-Driving" Danger 3. Accuracy and Backlash 4. Selection Table Advertisement 1. The Physics: Sliding vs. Rolling The fundamental difference is friction. Lead Screws rely on Sliding Friction . The nut (often bronze or plastic) slides directly against the steel screw threads. This generates heat and wear. Ball Screws re...
I first wrote about this topic back in 2009. At that time, finding a reliable "computational engine" online was a revelation. Today, while the tools have evolved significantly, the need for quick, accurate engineering calculations remains the same. Advertisement The Classic Powerhouse: Wolfram|Alpha Figure 1: Wolfram|Alpha parsing a natural language query for spring force. Wolfram|Alpha 's long-term goal is to make all systematic knowledge immediately computable and accessible to everyone. Unlike a standard search engine that gives you links, Wolfram|Alpha gives you answers based on structured data and physics formulas. For a mechanical engineer, this is incredibly useful. You can simply type a natural query like: "spring force k=500 N/m x=20mm" And it will instantly compute the result using Hooke's Law ( F = kx ), handling the unit conversions (mm to m) automatically. It serves as a d...