Skip to main content

Featured Post

Why I Wrote The Sheet Mechanic (And Why Calculations Aren’t Enough)

For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
NEW RELEASE: Stop trying to be a Hero. Start being a Mechanic. Get "The Sheet Mechanic" on Amazon »
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Perfect Straight-Line Mechanisms: Peaucellier-Lipkin & Sarrus

Figure 1: A modern interpretation of the Peaucellier-Lipkin linkage, showing the generation of a perfect straight line from rotary input.

The Quest for Perfection

In the world of kinematics, most straight-line generators (like the Hoekens Linkage or Watt's Linkage) produce only an approximate straight line. For general machinery, this is sufficient. However, for precision instrumentation and high-seal applications, engineers require exact straight-line motion.

This post explores the two most famous solutions to this problem: the planar Peaucellier–Lipkin linkage and the spatial Sarrus linkage.

Advertisement

1. The Peaucellier–Lipkin Linkage (Planar)

Invented in 1864, the Peaucellier–Lipkin cell was the first planar linkage capable of transforming rotary motion into a perfect straight line without using any reference guideways or sliders.

The Mathematics: Inversion of a Circle

The genius of this mechanism lies in pure geometry. It consists of seven links. The central "kite" shape ensures that the output point is the geometric inverse of the input path. When the input path is a circle passing through the center of inversion, the output path becomes a straight line (a circle with infinite radius).

Figure 2: The geometric construction of the Peaucellier cell.

Historical Significance

Before this invention, creating a perfect seal for a steam engine piston was difficult. CNC machining did not exist, so guide rails were often imperfect. The Peaucellier linkage allowed the piston to move perfectly straight, maintaining the seal and efficiency of the engine.

Figure 3: Video demonstration of a physical Peaucellier linkage model.

2. The Sarrus Linkage (Spatial)

While Peaucellier conquered the 2D plane, the Sarrus linkage (invented earlier in 1853 by Pierre Frédéric Sarrus) solved the problem in 3D space.

The Sarrus linkage is distinct because it is a spatial mechanism (or space crank). It uses hinged rectangular plates positioned perpendicular to each other. Because the hinges constrain the motion in two different orthogonal planes, the resulting motion is constrained strictly to a vertical line.

Sarrus linkage spatial animation showing vertical motion
Figure 4: Animation of the Sarrus linkage showing its purely vertical spatial motion.
Advertisement

Modern Applications

Today, the Sarrus linkage principle is frequently seen in industrial applications that require stable, guideless lifting.

  • Vertical Lift Modules: Used in warehousing to lift straight up without swaying.
  • Medical Tables: Scissor-style lifts often use similar principles to ensure patient stability.
  • Deployable Structures: In aerospace, Sarrus-like hinges are used to unfold solar panels in space.

References

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dowel Pins & Locating Pins: The Basics of Fixture Design

Figure 1: A typical fixture setup. Notice how dowel pins (silver) provide precise location, while bolts (not shown here) provide the clamping force. In the world of Precision Engineering , the difference between a high-quality product and a scrap part often comes down to microns. While bolts hold parts together, they are terrible at positioning them. This is where Dowel Pins and Locating Pins become essential components in industrial tooling . Advertisement What is a Dowel Pin? Dowel pins are precision-ground fasteners used to secure the relative position of two parts. They are typically machined to extremely tight tolerances (often within 0.0001 inches) and are available in materials like: Hardened Steel: For high-wear applications in CNC fixtures . Stainless Steel: For corrosion resistance in medical or food processing machinery. Plastic (Thermoplastic): For lightweight, non-conductive, low-load alignment. The ...

Engineer's Guide to Ball Detent Torque Limiters

Figure 1: The ball detent mechanism provides precise overload protection by disengaging instantly when the torque limit is exceeded. The First Line of Defense: Overload Clutches In high-speed automation and heavy industrial machinery, a "jam" is not a matter of if , but when . Whether it is a cardboard box getting stuck in a packaging machine or a tool crashing in a CNC lathe, the resulting torque spike can destroy gearboxes, twist shafts, and burn out expensive servo motors in milliseconds. A torque limiter (or overload clutch) is the mechanical fuse of the drive system. While electronic monitoring (current limiting) is common, it is often too slow to prevent physical damage from the massive kinetic energy stored in the system inertia. A mechanical torque limiter provides a physical disconnect that operates in a fraction of a second. Search for Torque Limiters & Safety Couplings Advertisement Why Choose ...

Conveyor Belt Tension Calculation: T1, T2 & Take-Up Design

In any friction-driven conveyor system, the most fundamental concept is the relationship between the Tight Side Tension (T 1 ) and the Slack Side Tension (T 2 ) . If you get this ratio wrong, your drive pulley will slip, your belt will wear out prematurely, or your take-up counterweight will be too light to maintain traction. In this guide, we will use CEMA standard calculations to determine the correct tensions and take-up weight. Table of Contents 1. The Basics: T1 vs T2 2. Euler’s Equation (The Grip Formula) 3. Worked Example: Calculating Tensions 4. Take-Up Units: Gravity vs Screw 5. Common Failure Modes Advertisement 1. The Basics: T1 vs T2 Imagine a conveyor belt running over a drive pulley. The motor pulls the belt, creating a tension differential: T 1 (Tight Side): The tension pulling the loaded belt toward the drive pulley. This is the highest tension point in the system. ...