Skip to main content

Featured Post

NEMA 17 vs NEMA 23: Torque, Speed, and When to Upgrade

When building a CNC router or upgrading a 3D printer, the first question is usually: "Is NEMA 17 enough, or do I need NEMA 23?" Most beginners look at the Holding Torque and stop there. This is a mistake. A NEMA 23 motor isn't just "stronger"—it is physically different in ways that affect your speed, your driver choice, and your machine's ability to avoid missed steps. If you choose a NEMA 17 for a heavy gantry, it is far more likely to overheat or lose steps under cutting load. If you choose NEMA 23 for a fast 3D printer, it might actually run slower than the smaller motor. This guide explains the engineering limits of each frame size. Table of Contents 1. Physical Difference (The Frame Size) 2. Torque & Speed (The Inductance Trap) 3. Driver Compatibility 4. Selection Summary Advertisement 1. Physical Difference (The Frame Size) "NEMA" is just a standard for ...
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Rotary Motion and Inertia: Newton’s Second Law for Rotation

In practice, most machines involve rotary motion as well as linear motion. Typical examples include electric motors, gears, pulleys, flywheels, and internal combustion engines. If we wish to calculate how quickly a machine reaches its full operating speed—determining the acceleration of its components—we must consider rotary acceleration and the associated torques.

Advertisement

Fortunately, Newton’s second law of motion applies equally well to rotary motion, provided that the correct rotational form of the equation is used.

The Challenge of Non-Uniform Motion

Consider a solid disc mounted on a shaft and rotated by a pull cord wrapped around its rim. We cannot apply the standard linear form of Newton’s second law, F = ma, because the resulting motion is rotational. Furthermore, material close to the axle travels very little distance, while material at the rim moves at a much higher speed. This non-uniform motion means that mass distribution plays a critical role.

Adapting Linear Kinematics to Rotation

Equations of uniform linear motion are adapted for rotary motion by substituting equivalent angular quantities:

  • Linear displacement (s) → Angular displacement (θ)
  • Linear velocity (v) → Angular velocity (ω)
  • Linear acceleration (a) → Angular acceleration (α), where α = a / r
  • Force (F) → Torque (Ï„), defined as Ï„ = F × r

1. Mass Moment of Inertia (I)

Mass represents an object’s resistance to linear acceleration. In rotational motion, resistance to angular acceleration depends not only on mass but also on how that mass is distributed. The quantity describing this resistance is the mass moment of inertia (I), measured in kg·m².

For a uniform solid disc (pulleys, flywheels):

I = (m · r²) / 2

If a manufacturer specifies a radius of gyration (k), the moment of inertia is calculated as:

I = m · k²
Advertisement

2. Newton’s Second Law for Rotation

We can now write the rotational equivalent of Newton’s second law. This equation is the foundation for sizing electric motors and analyzing dynamic loads:

Ï„ = I · α

The Engineering Role of Flywheels

A flywheel is a massive wheel mounted on a shaft specifically to provide rotational inertia. Its purpose is to smooth out speed fluctuations in machines with pulsating inputs, such as internal combustion engines.


Example Calculation

Problem: An electric motor accelerates a flywheel from rest to 3000 rev/min in 40 seconds. The flywheel is a uniform disc (m = 96 kg, r = 0.75 m). Calculate the required torque.

Motor rotates the flywheel
Figure 1: Flywheel acceleration parameters.

1. Find Final Angular Velocity (ω):

ω = (3000 rev/min × 2Ï€) / 60 = 314.2 rad/s

2. Calculate Angular Acceleration (α):

α = (ω2 - ω1) / t = (314.2 - 0) / 40 = 7.854 rad/s²

3. Calculate Moment of Inertia (I):

I = (m · r²) / 2 = (96 × 0.75²) / 2 = 27 kg·m²

4. Determine Required Torque (Ï„):

Ï„ = I · α = 27 × 7.854 = 212 N·m

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dowel Pins & Locating Pins: The Basics of Fixture Design

Figure 1: A typical fixture setup. Notice how dowel pins (silver) provide precise location, while bolts (not shown here) provide the clamping force. In the world of Precision Engineering , the difference between a high-quality product and a scrap part often comes down to microns. While bolts hold parts together, they are terrible at positioning them. This is where Dowel Pins and Locating Pins become essential components in industrial tooling . Advertisement What is a Dowel Pin? Dowel pins are precision-ground fasteners used to secure the relative position of two parts. They are typically machined to extremely tight tolerances (often within 0.0001 inches) and are available in materials like: Hardened Steel: For high-wear applications in CNC fixtures . Stainless Steel: For corrosion resistance in medical or food processing machinery. Plastic (Thermoplastic): For lightweight, non-conductive, low-load alignment. The ...

Hoeken's Linkage: Kinematics and Walking Robot Design

Figure 1: Animated simulation of the Hoeken’s Linkage showing the characteristic "tear-drop" coupler curve. 🚀 New Design Guide Available Don't just read about it—build it. Check out our new tutorial: How to Design a Hoeken’s Linkage in Excel (with Free VBA Simulator) » Introduction to the Hoekens Linkage The Hoekens linkage is a specialized four-bar mechanism designed to convert rotational motion into an approximate straight-line motion. While it serves a similar purpose to other straight-line generators, its unique coupler curve—a "tear-drop" shape—makes it exceptionally useful for intermittent motion and walking machines. One of the most fascinating aspects of kinematic theory is the concept of "Cognates." The Hoekens linkage is actually a cognate linkage of the Chebyshev Straight-line Mechanism . This means that while the physical structure and link lengths differ, they can generate...

Watt Straight-Line Linkage: Analysis and Automotive Uses

Figure 1: Watt's linkage example geometry and path generation. Introduction to Watt's Linkage The Watt's linkage (also known as the parallel motion linkage) is a cornerstone in the history of mechanical engineering. It is a type of four-bar linkage originally invented by James Watt in the late 18th century to solve a critical problem in steam engine design: constraining the piston rod to move in a straight line without using high-friction guideways. Before this invention, engines used chains to connect the piston to the beam, which meant they could only pull, not push. Watt's rigid linkage allowed for double-acting engines (pushing and pulling), doubling the power output. He was immensely proud of this kinematic solution, describing it in a 1784 letter to his partner Matthew Boulton: "I have got a glimpse of a method of causing a piston rod to move up and down perpendicularly by only fixing it to a piece of iron u...