Every linear motion design starts with the same choice: How do you convert rotary motor motion into linear travel? The two most common answers are the Lead Screw (simple, cheap, friction-based) and the Ball Screw (complex, expensive, rolling-based). Making the wrong choice here is costly. Use a lead screw where you need precision, and you get backlash. Use a ball screw in a vertical lift without a brake, and your load crashes to the floor. In this guide, we compare them side-by-side. Table of Contents 1. The Physics: Sliding vs. Rolling 2. Efficiency & The "Back-Driving" Danger 3. Accuracy and Backlash 4. Selection Table Advertisement 1. The Physics: Sliding vs. Rolling The fundamental difference is friction. Lead Screws rely on Sliding Friction . The nut (often bronze or plastic) slides directly against the steel screw threads. This generates heat and wear. Ball Screws re...
In post [ Part 1 - No Overlap Movement ] , we established the core design requirement: The die must work synchronously with the indexing mill. Advertisement Figure 1: The physical system requires precise synchronization. The Problem: Rigid Sequencing Without detailed calculation, inexperienced designers often end up with a rigid timing diagram. The die waits for the indexing to completely finish before moving. The Consequence: This compressed movement window results in extremely high acceleration ( 4.15 m/s² ). This leads to massive inertial forces, vibration, and premature equipment failure . The Solution: Optimized Overlap In post [ Part 3 - Cycloid Cam Profile Analysis ] , we utilized the "Soft Start" properties of the Cycloid profile. By allowing the motions to overlap safely, we extended the indexing angle significantly without causing collisions. The Engineering Impact: ...