For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
In the previous post [ 3-Position Motion Generation Four-Bar Linkage Synthesis ], the locations of the fixed ground pivots (O 2 and O 4 ) were mathematically determined by the positions of points A and B. The Problem: Sometimes, these calculated fixed pivots land in impossible locations—inside another machine part, off the machine base, or too far away. The Solution: We use Alternate Moving Pivots . Instead of using the endpoints of the line AB, we create new points (C and D) that are rigidly attached to the moving body. By adjusting the location of C and D, we can steer the fixed pivots (O 2 and O 4 ) to desirable locations. Advertisement Step 1: Define the Desired Motion Draw the coupler link AB in its three design positions: A 1 B 1 , A 2 B 2 , and A 3 B 3 . Figure 1: Defining the three target positions. Sometimes standard pivot locations are invalid or obstructed. Step 2: Define Alternate Moving Pivots (C and D) ...