For engineers who already know the math—but still lose projects. For the last few years, I’ve been sharing technical guides here on Mechanical Design Handbook —how to size a motor, how to calculate fits, and (as you recently read) how to choose between timing belts and ball screws. But after 25 years in industrial automation, I realized something uncomfortable: Projects rarely fail because the math was wrong. They fail because: The client changed the scope three times in one week. A critical vendor lied about a shipping date (and no one verified it). The installation technician couldn’t fit a wrench into the gap we designed. University taught us the physics. It didn’t teach us the reality. That gap is why I wrote my new book, The Sheet Mechanic . This is not a textbook. It is a field manual for the messy, political, and chaotic space between the CAD model and the factory floor. It captures the systems I’ve used to survive industrial projec...
In our previous tutorials, such as [ 3-Position Motion Generation Synthesis with Alternate Moving Pivots ], we used a "standard" synthesis approach. We defined the moving coupler first, and the geometric construction dictated where the ground pivots (O 2 and O 4 ) had to be. But what if you don't have that freedom? Advertisement In real-world machine design, you often have a pre-existing frame or base. You cannot drill holes just anywhere; the ground pivots must be located at specific, available points. In this scenario, the standard method fails because it gives you valid kinematic solutions that might require mounting a pivot in thin air or inside a motor. The Solution: Kinematic Inversion To solve this, we use the Inversion Method . The Core Concept Instead of looking at the mechanism from the perspective of a stationary ground and a moving coupler, we invert our perspective. We pretend the Coupler is stationary...